Backchannel talks led by Beijing and Moscow target November's forum in Shenzhen to bring the three leaders to the same negotiating table on security and global architecture.
International backchannels have intensified around a proposal to hold an unprecedented trilateral summit bringing together United States President Donald Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and Chinese President Xi Jinping. The effort centers on the upcoming Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum summit, scheduled for November 18–19, 2026, in the Chinese city of Shenzhen.
Preliminary talks and strategic planning for the format gained traction following regional diplomatic understandings—including coordinated negotiations in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, where Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping discussed joint strategies. The viability of the summit was publicly confirmed by Yuri Ushakov, the Kremlin's aide for international affairs, who pointed to the format as essential for debating major global security and trade nodes, provided agendas and geopolitical conditions align by November.
As the host of this year's APEC event, China has assumed a central role in backchannel negotiations. Xi Jinping’s government has worked to synchronize Donald Trump's confirmed attendance with the expectation of having Vladimir Putin as a guest, paving the way for joint talks or chained bilateral meetings in Asia.
"Opening high-level dialogue channels with the simultaneous participation of the three major global powers represents a unique opportunity to test lasting diplomatic solutions to current strategic impasses," note diplomatic sources close to the negotiations.
Caution in Washington
To date, the administration in Washington has maintained caution and has not issued an official confirmation accepting the trilateral format. International analysts point out that while the Trump administration maintains active, direct bilateral channels with the Kremlin aimed at negotiations to end the conflict in Ukraine, a direct summit with the simultaneous presence of Xi Jinping carries strong strategic and power-balance implications that require careful calibration by American diplomacy.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Observação: somente um membro deste blog pode postar um comentário.